<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://vocalnation.net/css/feed_styles.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >
    <channel>
        <title>Regional Postings: Iraq</title>
        <description>Recent Postings from the region Iraq at VocalNation.net</description>
        <link>http://vocalnation.net/user/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:53:53 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        
        <subscribe>
			Subscribe to this feed by copying the URL from your browser's address bar into your feedreader of choice.
			You may choose to use a web-based feedreader such as
			Google Reader, NewsGator, Rojo, etc.
			or one of the many browser-plugin feed readers.
				</subscribe>
        <item>
            <title>My Plan for Iraq - By Barack Obama</title>
            <link>http://vocalnation.net/posting/196356/My+Plan+for+Iraq+-+By+Barack+Obama/</link>
            <description><![CDATA["The call by Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki for a timetable for the removal of American troops from Iraq presents an enormous opportunity. We should seize this moment to begin the phased redeployment of combat troops that I have long advocated, and that is needed for long-term success in Iraq and the security interests of the United States."<br>...<br>"The good news is that Iraq’s leaders want to take responsibility for their country by negotiating a timetable for the removal of American troops. Meanwhile, Lt. Gen. James Dubik, the American officer in charge of training Iraq’s security forces, estimates that the Iraqi Army and police will be ready to assume responsibility for security in 2009."<br><br>"Only by redeploying our troops can we press the Iraqis to reach comprehensive political accommodation and achieve a successful transition to Iraqis’ taking responsibility for the security and stability of their country. Instead of seizing the moment and encouraging Iraqis to step up, the Bush administration and Senator McCain are refusing to embrace this transition — despite their previous commitments to respect the will of Iraq’s sovereign government. They call any timetable for the removal of American troops “surrender,” even though we would be turning Iraq over to a sovereign Iraqi government."<br>...]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:18:35 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>Posting196356-1216156715</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title> Iraq wants to set a timetable for a US withdrawl - BBC</title>
            <link>http://vocalnation.net/posting/196350/+Iraq+wants+to+set+a+timetable+for+a+US+withdrawl+-+BBC/</link>
            <description><![CDATA["Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki has raised the prospect of setting a timetable for the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq."<br><br>"...correspondents say Iraqi MPs would be more likely to back Mr Maliki if the deal includes such a timetable."<br><br>"The US and Iraqi governments have been negotiating a detailed bilateral Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) since March and it was supposed to be concluded this month.<br><br>Many Iraqis want to see an end to the American military presence in their country, but are fearful of the consequences for security. "]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:12:57 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>Posting196350-1215565977</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>IRAQ HEARINGS: Sen. Obama Questions Gen. Petraeus</title>
            <link>http://vocalnation.net/posting/82421/IRAQ+HEARINGS%3A+Sen.+Obama+Questions+Gen.+Petraeus/</link>
            <description><![CDATA[From the Sept 2007 hearings]]></description>
            <enclosure url="http://www.youtube.com/v/F9wtAqXq7Sg&amp;hl=en" length="123123" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" />
            <media:content url="http://www.youtube.com/v/F9wtAqXq7Sg&amp;hl=en" fileSize="123123" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" />
            <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:42:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>Posting82421-1208209376</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title> Iraq on the Improve - Thomas Ricks on NPR's Fresh Air</title>
            <link>http://vocalnation.net/posting/1132/+Iraq+on+the+Improve+-+Thomas+Ricks+on+NPR%27s+Fresh+Air/</link>
            <description><![CDATA[I was a bit skeptical when I heard that things were improving in Iraq, but things really do seem to be taking a small turn for the better. &nbsp;But "the larger story is more complex that it may seem". &nbsp;Washington Post correspondent Thomas Ricks gives a clear assessment of what's really happening over there, without all of the political spin we hear so regularly. &nbsp;<br><br>A few key points:<br><br>The surge has been successful in that it has improved security, but unsuccessful in allowing for political progress of the central government. &nbsp;<br><br>As a response to the central government's inability to get things done, provincal governments are beginning to popup all over Iraq at the grassroots level.<br><br>The primary focus of the military's strategy since General Petraeus took the helm has shifted towards "protecting the Iraqi people". &nbsp;<br><br>The U.S. has been cutting deals with sunni insurgent groups, actually giving them weapons and money in order to fight Al Qaeda and police their own neighborhoods. &nbsp;In some instances the U.S. military has even fought along side of them. &nbsp;This has proved to be very effective. &nbsp;Iraq's central government isn't too happy with this - this may be because the government is Shiite dominated.<br><br>One reason for the decrease in violence is that many of these areas are now "ethnically cleansed". &nbsp;About 10% of the population has fled iraq. &nbsp;Some fear the situation may flare up again once the refugees begin to return.<br><br>Private military contractors (Blackwater etc.) are regarded by the military with "loathing or contempt", that they don't have the best interest of the country in mind, and are regarded as "cowboys".<br><br>The moral of the troops is starting to get very low due to their extended tours. &nbsp;A lot of people in the military are worried about there being a sharp decline in the number of career service men.]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 05:42:31 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>Posting1132-1196574151</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>No End In Site - Movie Trailor</title>
            <link>http://vocalnation.net/posting/970/No+End+In+Site+-+Movie+Trailor/</link>
            <description><![CDATA[I just checked out this movie this weekend and I really recommend it. &nbsp;It's a pretty unbiased documentary looking into the reconstruction effort in Iraq. <br> <br>Here's the basic storyline: &nbsp;Many of the iraqis did initially greet the U.S. as liberators after the invasion. &nbsp;Things started to go to shit afterwards, largely because the Bush administration had not planned for rebuilding all the infrastructure that had been taken out during the invasion. &nbsp;Some of the top generals including General Shinseki and Colin Powell were warning that there wouldn't be enough troops to pull it off. &nbsp;Intially the iraqis were trying to get involved with the reconstruction, but the reconstruction contracts were all awarded to U.S. companies, even though the iraqis typically got the work done a lot sooner. &nbsp;Things got really bad after all of their career politicals were fired (debaathification), and there military was laid off and decided to start raiding weapons caches. &nbsp; <br> <br>Bottom line: the planning and execution of the reconstruction effort in Iraq has been run incompetiently. <br> <br><a href="http://www.noendinsightmovie.com/">No End in Site - Website</a>]]></description>
            <enclosure url="http://www.youtube.com/v/qGPp-WhgEXE&amp;rel=1" length="123123" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" />
            <media:content url="http://www.youtube.com/v/qGPp-WhgEXE&amp;rel=1" fileSize="123123" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" />
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 06:42:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>Posting970-1194849747</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Looking back on the years since 9/11</title>
            <link>http://vocalnation.net/posting/615/Looking+back+on+the+years+since+9+11/</link>
            <description><![CDATA[With the anniversary of 9/11 just passing, a lot of people have been looking back trying to figure out how we got to where we are - reanalyzing our steps that led us into Iraq. &nbsp;Over the past six years, 9/11 has loomed large in the minds of American. That day changed our course, and redirected our efforts from the more positive things in life that we should be concerned with. We have been at a standstill on issues like education and healthcare. We have been divided as a nation. It has filled our TVs and our minds with images of war. And our actions since have pulled the country into record debt. <br> <br>No doubt, 9/11 was a travesty. But in terms of human lives, it was a drop in the bucket compared to what has occurred since. Three thousand lives were lost on 9/11. Somewhere between one hundred thousand to a million Iraqi civilians have now been killed. The equivalent of a hundred 9/11s. &nbsp;Two million refuges have fled the country. These numbers are seldom mentioned solely for the fact that they are Iraqis. But it wasn't Bin Laden that took their lives, nor could it be said that America is solely to blame... <br> <br>It's easy to go to war. Being attacked as we did was a result of many factors vastly more complicated than "they hate us for our freedom". &nbsp;With the subsequent Iraq invasion, the Bush Administration actively sought conflict. &nbsp;They removed Saddam like they were ripping of a scab. The plans to invade Iraq were finished well in advance of September 11th. &nbsp;As far back as 1998 the NeoCons were pushing Clinton to invade Iraq. &nbsp;(The military can't sit idle for long before budgets are cut and the economy begins to suffer). But hindsight is 20/20. How do we start mending these wounds?]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:45:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>Posting615-1189752318</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What Iraq Shows Us: The Breakdown of the System Leads to Chaos</title>
            <link>http://vocalnation.net/posting/149/What+Iraq+Shows+Us%3A+The+Breakdown+of+the+System+Leads+to+Chaos/</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<strong>Picture what would happen if the police and the military were disbanded.</strong><br><Br>

How long would it take for looting to break out? <br><Br>  

How long would it take before people would start killing
without any fear of consequence?<br><Br>

Would gangs start to grow?  Would
society start to fragment into feuding militias?  <br><Br>



How long would it take before chaos took hold and the entire
system collapsed?<br><Br>



We can answer all of these questions by looking at what Iraq
has now become.  But lets first go back
and analyze how the system was dismantled. <br><Br>



Within months of the U.S. invasion, we had successfully
removed the entire governmental system of Iraq.  The mission was accomplished with a finality and excellence that
no other nation could ever even dream of doing.  We took out their power stations, their communication networks,
and their government buildings.  Then
once we had Baghdad, we disbanded all of the government officials and the
entire Iraqi military and police force. 
We called it De-Baathification, as we were taking Saddams Baath party
out of power.<br><Br>

 

We had dismantled the system that the nation of Iraq was
built upon with surgical precision  and
was in that moment that we <em>ensured </em>the chaos that we are seeing there today.<br><Br>



The goal of transforming the nation of Iraq into a
pro-western democracy is a commendable one. 
As much as the left is known to empathize with other cultures, I dont
know anyone who would gladly give up the freedoms that America offers in
exchange for a life under one of these oppressive regimes.  But in hindsight, it has become clear that
the strategy we took was shortsighted and incomplete at best.  <br><Br>

 

The U.S. has equaled military power.  The U.S. could probably tear apart the
governments of all oppressive regimes throughout the world.  But what would result would be worldwide conflict.  A system of government cannot
evolve into a democracy by completely tearing it down. 
If Iraq has taught us anything, it is this: The breakdown of
the system leads to chaos.
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 10:28:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>Posting149-1178965733</guid>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
